<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightweight Project Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management/</link>
	<description>Interests, Ideas and Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management/comment-page-1/#comment-10086</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management-2/#comment-10086</guid>
		<description>Hi - If you are talking about Freemind - I can&#039;t recommend it highly enough.  It is a mind-map program and I find it fast and fluid. This program does not at this stage have any links with PM software. V0.9 which is due soon will have the ability to add attributes to the entries in the mind map and perhaps they could be linked up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; If you are talking about Freemind &#8211; I can&#8217;t recommend it highly enough.  It is a mind-map program and I find it fast and fluid. This program does not at this stage have any links with PM software. V0.9 which is due soon will have the ability to add attributes to the entries in the mind map and perhaps they could be linked up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management/comment-page-1/#comment-10085</link>
		<dc:creator>PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management-2/#comment-10085</guid>
		<description>I\&#039;ve just checked this software (did not install it though), and I have to tell you it doesn\&#039;t look like the most intuitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;ve just checked this software (did not install it though), and I have to tell you it doesn\&#8217;t look like the most intuitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management/comment-page-1/#comment-10083</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management-2/#comment-10083</guid>
		<description>Hey, free flow of ideas is a must. And you are absolutely right. Software systems are no magic bullet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, free flow of ideas is a must. And you are absolutely right. Software systems are no magic bullet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Rosenhead</title>
		<link>http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management/comment-page-1/#comment-10082</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidpratten.com/2008/08/02/lightweight-project-management-2/#comment-10082</guid>
		<description>David, I have not seen the software that you refer to however it poses a problem for me...as you say, work breakdown is critical for project success. One problem I see with software is that people break projects down in a linear way. By this I mean they have one work packager and build downwards from this. The danger is there is no free flowing of ideas, suggestions. 

I have worked with many project teams who have applied the process you described (no software…) and they have discovered large omissions. At least they discovered them but in some instances the omissions were pretty serious

So, I am not too convinced about the merits of a software approach…please convince me!


Ron Rosenhead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I have not seen the software that you refer to however it poses a problem for me&#8230;as you say, work breakdown is critical for project success. One problem I see with software is that people break projects down in a linear way. By this I mean they have one work packager and build downwards from this. The danger is there is no free flowing of ideas, suggestions. </p>
<p>I have worked with many project teams who have applied the process you described (no software…) and they have discovered large omissions. At least they discovered them but in some instances the omissions were pretty serious</p>
<p>So, I am not too convinced about the merits of a software approach…please convince me!</p>
<p>Ron Rosenhead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
